Total Pageviews

Friday, May 18, 2012

Mulgrew to ATRs: You are second-class UFT members

Marjorie Stamberg reports:

At the Wednesday, May 16 meeting of the UFT's Delegate Assembly , I raised the issue of the union's cynical "solution" to the UFT's disenfranchisment of ATRs in the union elections. Many ATRs had no place to vote in the union elections as they trudge from school to school on a weekly basis, where they are treated as non-people until they move on the next week. This week-to-week trek was agreed upon by the union and the DOE last spring, as part of the deal that there be no teacher layoffs. Last fall, I and others put forward motions that the ATRs be accorded their full voting rights with their own chapter. We have been fighting for this for several years, and it has always been brushed off with the excuse that their situation is only "temporary."  

Last week, the UFT leadership announced a "solution"--with chapter elections upon us, they decided that ATRs would vote at the school where they are for the week the elections are held. This is outrageous--how can ATR teachers effectively advocate for their needs when they are "here today, gone tomorrow," and the chapter representatives are not accountable to them? 

UFT President, Michael Mulgrew
Yesterday, when I raised this issue in the question period at the delegate assembly, Mulgrew refused to let me get a sentence out, interrupting me, harassing and yelling, "What's your question," "Make it a question," "That's not a question!" Following his lead, a passel of Unity delegates obediently picked up the jeer. Over the din, I was finally able to get out, "My question is, how do you justify this outrageous cynical disenfranchisement of the ATRs' right to vote?" and saying "the ATRs need their own chapter."

The Artful Dodger
Mulgrew answered with a time-honored evasion: The union is in arbitration, he said, because the DOE has not kept to its commitment to place ATRs in open positions and long-term vacancies. Until this arbitration is settled, the union is doing the "best it can" to give ATRs voting rights. He was silent on the fact that the weekly trek of ATRs is happening with the consent of the UFT leadership, which agreed to it as part of the deal on layoffs last spring.

Don't worry, I will keep on raising this issue. With more schools closing than ever, there will be a huge swelling of the ATR pool next fall. As we all know, "If you're not ATR, you could be soon." The fight for rights of ATR teachers is everyone's fight.


  1. thanks for your work exposing this shameful deal and treatment of atrs. the uft leadership is as complicit as the doe, and the present and recent past leadership has lost all credibility.
    btw, im not an atr, but like anyone else, can be any time. time for mulgrew et al to be moved somewhere else, maybe a corporate consultant or something. but be sure to move them every week.

  2. Actually, I think it's important to realize that the UFT is trying to get the DOE to live up to its commitment. The problem of where to vote is complicated by many factors, not the least of which being that a lot of the new small schools don't even have UFT Reps, and if they do, they are often green and unfamiliar with the whole ATR situation. The UFT has helped me a lot. It's the DOE that is making all of this impossible.

  3. "the UFt is trying to get the DOE to live up to its commitment". Can you please explain what the Unity cacuas lead UFT is doing? The agreement only states we have to be interviewed for vacancies, not hired. The UFT should of anticipated the DOE ignoring their agreements (just like with the rubber rooms)and have some enforcement mechinisms build into the agreements. Otherwise, do not agree. I just spoke with somone who is teaching full-time as a social studies teacher on a sub license, who is interviewing for next year. Principals tell him not to worry, they can get around any agreemtns and not hire an ATR.

  4. They're actually trying to prove that the DOE is not making any real effort to hire ATR's. It is yet another point which is going to arbitration.